000 04185nam a22005295i 4500
001 978-3-319-90955-4
003 DE-He213
005 20210511120415.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 180911s2018 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 _a9783319909554
_9978-3-319-90955-4
024 7 _a10.1007/978-3-319-90955-4
_2doi
050 4 _aBJ1-1725
072 7 _aHPQ
_2bicssc
072 7 _aPHI005000
_2bisacsh
072 7 _aQDTQ
_2thema
082 0 4 _a170
_223
245 1 0 _aPeer Review, Peer Education, and Modeling in the Practice of Clinical Ethics Consultation: The Zadeh Project
_h[electronic resource] /
_cedited by Stuart G. Finder, Mark J. Bliton.
250 _a1st ed. 2018.
264 1 _aCham :
_bSpringer International Publishing :
_bImprint: Springer,
_c2018.
300 _aXI, 228 p. 2 illus.
_bonline resource.
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
_bPDF
_2rda
505 0 _aIntroduction; Bliton & Finder -- Case Scenario; Finder -- Critical commentary on scenario; Armstrong, Frolic & Rubin, Hynds, Rosell & Johnson, Tarzian, Tsai -- Method; Agich, Aulisio, Hurst, Rasmussen -- Critical commentary on method; Bishop, Molewijk, Reiter-Theil -- Conclusion – Bliton & Finder.
506 0 _aOpen Access
520 _aThis open access book about the Zadeh Project demonstrates and explores a core question in clinical ethics: how can ethics consultants be accountable in the face of a robust plurality of ethical standpoints, especially those that underwrite practices and methods for doing ethics consultation as well as those viewpoints and values encountered in daily clinical ethics practice? Underscoring this question is the recognition that the field of clinical ethics consultation has arrived at a crucial point in its maturation. Many efforts are underway to more formally “professionalize” the field, with most aimed toward stabilizing a specific set of institutional considerations. Stretched between these institutional and practical initiatives resides a crucial set of of ethical considerations, chief among them the meaning and scope of responsibility for clinical ethics consultants. Developed around a long-form case scenario, the Zadeh Project provides a multi-layered series of “peer-reviews”: critique of the actions of the case scenario’s ethics consultant; reflection on clinical ethics method; examination of the many ways that commitments to method and practice can, and do, intersect, overlap, and alter one another. The design and format of this book thus models a key element for clinical ethics practice: the need and ability to provide careful and thoughtful explanation of core moral considerations that emerge among diverse standpoints. Specifically designed for those studying to become and those who are ethics consultants, this book, with its innovative and multi-layered approach, allows readers to share a peer-review-like experience that shows accountability to be what it is, an ethical, not merely procedural or administrative, undertaking.
650 0 _aEthics.
_9499
650 0 _aHealth administration.
_94321
650 1 4 _aEthics.
_0https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E14000
_9499
650 2 4 _aHealth Administration.
_0https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/H27030
_94322
700 1 _aFinder, Stuart G.
_eeditor.
_4edt
_4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
_94323
700 1 _aBliton, Mark J.
_eeditor.
_4edt
_4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
_94324
710 2 _aSpringerLink (Online service)
_9141
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783319909530
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783319909547
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783030081409
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90955-4
912 _aZDB-2-REP
912 _aZDB-2-SXPR
912 _aZDB-2-SOB
942 _cEBK
_w1
_xAdministrator Library
_y1
_z Administrator Library
999 _c904
_d904
773 _tSpringer Nature Open Access eBook