TY  - BOOK
AU  - Bungenberg,Marc
AU  - Reinisch,August
ED  - SpringerLink (Online service)
TI  - From Bilateral Arbitral Tribunals and Investment Courts to a Multilateral Investment Court: Options Regarding the Institutionalization of Investor-State Dispute Settlement 
T2  - Special Issue,
SN  - 9783662597323
AV  - K5459 
U1  - 347.09 23
PY  - 2020///
CY  - Berlin, Heidelberg
PB  - Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Imprint: Springer
KW  - Mediation
KW  - Dispute resolution (Law)
KW  - Conflict management
KW  - International law
KW  - Trade
KW  - Dispute Resolution, Mediation, Arbitration
KW  - International Economic Law, Trade Law
KW  - Sources and Subjects of International Law, International Organizations
N1  - FM -- Executive Summary -- Introduction -- Targets for the Reorganization of the Investment Protection Regime -- Design and Implementation of a Two-Tiered MIC -- Applicable Law -- The Pronoucement of Decisions and Its Consequences -- Recognition and Enforcement of Decisions.-Possibilities for the Establishment of an MIC and a Possible Connection to Existing Institutions and System Conformity -- Standalone Appeal Mechanism: “Multilateral Investment Appeals Mechanism” (MIAM)  -- Index; Open Access
N2  - This open access book considers the potential setup for a future Multilateral Investment Court (MIC). The option of an MIC was first discussed by the EU Commission in 2016 and has since been made an official element of the EU Common Commercial Policy. In 2017, UNCITRAL also decided to discuss the possibility of an MIC, and on 20 March 2018, the Council of the EU gave the EU Commission the mandate to negotiate the creation of an MIC. The “feasibility study” presented here is intended to contribute to a broader discussion on the options for a new international court specialized in investment protection. The cornerstones of such a new permanent court are a strict orientation on the rule of law, reduced costs of investment protection, transparency considerations, aspects of consistency in case law, and the effective enforceability of MIC decisions
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-59732-3
ER  -