Los Angeles and the Summer Olympic Games [electronic resource] : Planning Legacies / by Eva Kassens Noor.

By: Kassens Noor, Eva [author.]
Contributor(s): SpringerLink (Online service)
Material type: TextTextSeries: SpringerBriefs in Geography: Publisher: Cham : Springer International Publishing : Imprint: Springer, 2020Edition: 1st ed. 2020Description: XV, 60 p. 5 illus., 1 illus. in color. online resourceContent type: text Media type: computer Carrier type: online resourceISBN: 9783030385538Subject(s): Urban geography | Sports—Sociological aspects | Economic geography | Municipal government | Urban Geography / Urbanism (inc. megacities, cities, towns) | Sociology of Sport and Leisure | Economic Geography | Urban PoliticsAdditional physical formats: Printed edition:: No title; Printed edition:: No titleDDC classification: 307.76 LOC classification: GF125Online resources: Click here to access online
Contents:
Foreword -- 1 Introduction -- 2. The Los Angeles Olympics 1932 -- 3 The Los Angeles Olympics 1984 -- 4 The Los Angeles Olympics 2028 -- 5 Similarities and differences between the three LA Olympics -- 6 Conclusionf: Legacies of the 2028 Olympics -- Index -- Acronyms. .
In: Springer Nature Open Access eBookSummary: This open access book describes the three planning approaches and legacy impacts for the Olympic Games in one locale: the city of Los Angeles, USA. The author critically compares the similarities and differences of the LA Olympics by reviewing the 1932 and 1984 Olympics and by analyzing the concurrent planning process for the 2028 Olympics. The author unravels the conditions that make (or do not make) LA28’s argument “we have staged the Games before, we can do it again” compelling. Setting the bid’s promises into the contemporary local and global mega-event contexts, the author analyzes why LA won the bids, how those wins allowed LA to negotiate concessions with the IOC and NOC, and how legacies were planned, executed, and ultimately evolved. The author concludes with a prediction which 2028 legacy promises might and might not be fulfilled given the local and international Olympic contexts.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

Foreword -- 1 Introduction -- 2. The Los Angeles Olympics 1932 -- 3 The Los Angeles Olympics 1984 -- 4 The Los Angeles Olympics 2028 -- 5 Similarities and differences between the three LA Olympics -- 6 Conclusionf: Legacies of the 2028 Olympics -- Index -- Acronyms. .

Open Access

This open access book describes the three planning approaches and legacy impacts for the Olympic Games in one locale: the city of Los Angeles, USA. The author critically compares the similarities and differences of the LA Olympics by reviewing the 1932 and 1984 Olympics and by analyzing the concurrent planning process for the 2028 Olympics. The author unravels the conditions that make (or do not make) LA28’s argument “we have staged the Games before, we can do it again” compelling. Setting the bid’s promises into the contemporary local and global mega-event contexts, the author analyzes why LA won the bids, how those wins allowed LA to negotiate concessions with the IOC and NOC, and how legacies were planned, executed, and ultimately evolved. The author concludes with a prediction which 2028 legacy promises might and might not be fulfilled given the local and international Olympic contexts.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.
Supported by Central Library, NIT Hamirpur
Powered by KOHA